Call or text: Coming Soon

Strict Liability Dog Bite Cases: Memphis

In many states, strict liability laws apply to dog bite cases, meaning that dog owners can be held liable for injuries caused by their pets regardless of negligence or prior knowledge of the dog’s aggressive tendencies. If you’ve been bitten by a dog in a state with strict liability laws, you don’t have to prove that the owner was negligent – the fact that you were bitten may be enough to hold the owner accountable.

We specialize in helping dog bite victims navigate strict liability laws and pursue the compensation they deserve.

What Is Strict Liability in Dog Bite Cases?

Understanding How Strict Liability Laws Work

Strict liability, where it applies, means that the dog owner can be held responsible for injuries caused by their dog without needing to prove negligence or prior knowledge of dangerous tendencies.

In states that follow the ‘one-bite rule,’ victims must demonstrate that the dog owner knew or should have known that their dog had aggressive tendencies. This typically requires proof that the dog had previously bitten someone or exhibited aggressive behavior.

Strict liability applies not only in public areas but also when the attack occurs on the dog owner’s property, as long as the victim was lawfully present and not provoking the dog.

How Strict Liability Differs from Negligence Claims

Strict Liability vs. Negligence: Key Differences

In dog bite cases, the legal approach differs depending on whether the case involves strict liability or negligence. Here’s how the two differ:

  • Negligence Claims: In a negligence-based case, the victim must prove that the dog owner failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the attack. This might include ignoring leash laws, failing to restrain a known aggressive dog, or not warning visitors about the dog’s behavior.
  • Strict Liability Claims: In strict liability cases, the dog owner is responsible for injuries caused by their dog, regardless of whether they followed local laws or had prior knowledge of the dog’s aggressive tendencies. In Tennessee, dog owners are held strictly liable for injuries their dog causes, whether the dog had previously shown aggression or not. However, exceptions apply, such as when the victim was trespassing, provoking the dog, or engaged in illegal activity. These factors can limit or eliminate the owner’s liability.

Strict liability benefits victims by eliminating the need to prove negligence, as the dog owner is automatically responsible for the injuries caused. This makes it easier for victims to recover compensation in dog bite cases.

When Does Strict Liability Apply?

Situations Where Strict Liability Dog Bite Laws Are Enforced

Tennessee follows strict liability, meaning the dog owner is responsible for injuries caused by their dog, even if the dog has never bitten anyone before. However, if the victim was unlawfully on the property or provoked the dog, the owner’s liability may be reduced or negated.

  • The Attack Occurred in a Public Space: If the dog bite occurred in a public area, such as a park or sidewalk, the dog owner is likely to be held strictly liable for the attack.
  • The Victim Was Not Provoking the Dog: In most strict liability cases, the victim must not have provoked the dog in any way, such as teasing or attacking the animal.
  • No Prior Aggression Is Required: Unlike negligence claims, which may require proving the dog had a history of aggression, strict liability holds the dog owner accountable even if the dog has never bitten anyone before.

Our team will assess the specific laws in your state and ensure that your claim is filed under the correct legal framework to maximize your chances of recovery.

How We Can Help You Pursue a Strict Liability Claim

We’ll Fight to Hold the Dog Owner Liable for Your Injuries

We have extensive experience handling strict liability dog bite cases. Our legal team will guide you through the process of filing a claim, ensuring you receive the compensation you need for your recovery. Here’s how we help:

  • Evaluate Your Case Under Strict Liability Laws: We will determine whether your state’s strict liability laws apply to your case and explain your legal rights and options.
  • Collect Evidence of the Attack: While strict liability doesn’t require proof of negligence, we will gather crucial evidence—such as medical records, photos, and witness statements—to demonstrate that the attack occurred while you were lawfully present and not provoking the dog.
  • Handle Insurance Negotiations: Our team will negotiate with the dog owner’s insurance company to secure a fair settlement for your medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
  • Prepare for Court if Necessary: If the insurance company refuses to offer a fair settlement, we are prepared to take your case to court to ensure you get the compensation you deserve.

You don’t have to navigate strict liability laws alone. Our team is here to make the process as smooth as possible and ensure that you are fully compensated for your injuries.

Common Defenses in Strict Liability Cases

Potential Challenges and How We Overcome Them

While strict liability laws make it easier to hold a dog owner accountable, there are still some defenses that the owner or their insurance company may try to use, including:

  • Provocation Defense: In Tennessee, dog owners may avoid liability or have it reduced if they can prove that the victim provoked the dog in a way that caused the attack, such as teasing or threatening the animal. These are the primary defenses in dog bite cases under Tennessee’s strict liability law. If the victim was unlawfully on the property or provoked the dog, the owner’s liability may be reduced or eliminated.
  • Trespassing Defense: Tennessee’s strict liability rule does not apply if the victim was unlawfully on the dog owner’s property. In these cases, the victim must prove negligence or dangerous behavior that the owner should have addressed.
  • Assumption of Risk: While assumption of risk may be raised in some personal injury cases, in Tennessee dog bite cases, the focus remains on whether the victim provoked the dog or was unlawfully on the property.
  • Contributory Negligence: In some cases, a defense of contributory negligence may be raised, arguing that the victim’s own actions contributed to the attack, which could reduce the compensation under Tennessee’s comparative fault rule.

Our team is prepared to handle these defenses and ensure that the strict liability rules are properly applied to hold the dog owner responsible for the attack.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQs About Strict Liability Dog Bite Cases

Do all states have strict liability laws for dog bites?
No, not all states have strict liability laws. Some states follow a “one-bite rule” or require the victim to prove that the owner was negligent.

Can I still file a claim if the dog has never bitten anyone before?
Yes, under strict liability laws, the dog owner can be held responsible for a first-time attack. You don’t have to prove that the dog had a history of aggression.

How much compensation can I receive in a strict liability case?
Compensation in strict liability dog bite cases can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional trauma, and any long-term care needs. The exact amount depends on the severity of the injury and the impact on the victim’s life. In Tennessee, punitive damages are not typically awarded unless there is evidence of gross negligence or willful misconduct by the dog owner.